Sukhwant Singh Vs State
of Punjab on 18th June 2009 in Supreme Court of India
The Constitution Of
India 1949: Article 21
The Code Of Criminal
Procedure, 1973: Section 438
C.R.Radhakrishna Kurup
vs State Of Kerala on 9 June, 2011
No./ In Crmp.1244/2012
Of Dist & ... vs Jerome on 11 June, 2012
Against The
Order/Judgment In ... vs Siby Thomas
Sumeet Malhotra vs Govt
Of Nct Of Delhi on 21 September, 2015
Article 21:
The reputation of a
person is his valuable asset, and is a facet of his right under Article 21 of
the Constitution of India; 2009 (7) SCC 559
IMPORTANT
A Court hearing a
regular bail application has got inherent power to grant interim bail pending
final disposal of the bail application - If accused is arrested and thereafter
released on bail, his reputation may be tarnished which is his valuable asset.
Constitution of India,
Article 21 - Criminal Procedure Code, Section 438 - Interim bail - Anticipatory
bail - A Court hearing a regular bail application has got inherent power to
grant interim bail pending final disposal of the bail application - Further
held -
This is the proper view
in view of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which protects the life and
liberty of every person when a person applies for regular bail then the Court
concerned ordinarily lists that application after a few days so that it can look
into the case diary which has to be obtained from the police authorities and in
the meantime the applicant is released on bail thereafter, his reputation may
be tarnished irreparably in society - The reputation of a person is his
valuable asset, and is a facet of his right under Article 21. 2009(3) RCR
(Criminal) 401: 2009(4) RAJ 151 (SC) and 2008(4) RCR (Criminal) 961: 2008(6)
RAJ 357 (SC) relied.
[Para 2]
Cases referred:
Kamlendra Pratap Singh
v. State of U.P., 2009(3) RCR (Criminal) 401: 2009(4) RAJ 151: 2009(4) SCALE
77.
Deepak Bajaj v. State
of Maharashtra, 2008(4) RCR (Criminal) 961: 2008(6) RAJ 357: JT 2008(11) SC
609.
Sukhwant Singh v. State
of Punjab, (SC): Law Finder Doc Id # 202861
2010(1) AICLR 113:
2010(1) MLJ (Criminal) 401: 2009(4) R.C.R.(Criminal) 868: 2009(6) Recent Apex
Judgments (R.A.J.) 106: 2009(7) SCC 559 : 2009(3) JCC 1716: 2010(116) CriLJ
1435: 2009(5) MPHT 139: 2010(3) AIR Jhar R. 802: 2009(3) SCC(Cri) 487: 2010 AIR
(SCW) 1185: 2010(1) PLR 230: 2009(4) CCR 384: 2009(7) Scale 700: 2010 Cri. L.R.
286: 2010(1) Cri.CC 57: 2009(2) CalCriLR 666
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 3529
of 2009.
Sukhwant Singh &
Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab -
Respondent
Before: - Markandey
Katju and Deepak Verma, JJ.
D/d. 18.05.2009.
For the Petitioners:-
Gautam Godara and Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Advocates.
ORDER
Heard learned counsel
for the petitioners.
2. This petition has
been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 24.03.2009 of a learned
Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh whereby
the Application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code for grant of
anticipatory bail has been dismissed.
3. We are not inclined
to interfere with the impugned judgment and order.
However, following the
decision of this Court in the case of Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P.
& Ors., 2009(3) RCR(Criminal) 401 : 2009(4) RAJ 151 : 2009(4) SCALE 77, we
reiterate that a Court hearing a regular bail application has got inherent
power to grant interim bail pending final disposal of the bail application. In
our opinion, this is the proper view in view of Article 21 of the Constitution
of India which protects the life and liberty of every person. When a person
applies for regular bail then the court concerned ordinarily lists that
application after a few days so that it can look into the case diary which has
to be obtained from the police authorities and in the meantime the applicant
has to go to jail. Even if the applicant is released on bail thereafter, his
reputation may be tarnished irreparably in society. The reputation of a person
is his valuable asset, and is a facet of his right under Article 21 of the
Constitution vide Deepak Bajaj v. State of Maharashtra & Anr., 2008(4) RCR(Criminal)
961 : 2008(6) RAJ 357 : JT 2008(11) SC 609.
4. Hence, we are of the
opinion that in the power to grant bail there is inherent power in the court
concerned to grant interim bail to a person pending final disposal of the bail
application. Of course, it is in the discretion of the court concerned to grant
interim bail or not but the power is certainly there.
5. In the present case,
if the petitioners surrender before the Court concerned and makes a prayer for
grant of interim bail pending final disposal of the bail application, the same
shall be considered and decided on the same day.
With the above said
observations, the petition stands disposed of.
Order accordingly.
No comments:
Post a Comment